<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Free Great Fonts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.melodiesinmarketing.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.melodiesinmarketing.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/</link>
	<description>Ethical and Delightful Design for Communications, Products, and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:07:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Microsoft Fonts &#171; Industrial/Combine</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiesinmarketing.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>New Microsoft Fonts &#171; Industrial/Combine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vellandi.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] again: the number of blogs relating to new MS fonts is vast. Here are a few links: 1 2 3 Search on the web for more if you wish. Here is the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] again: the number of blogs relating to new MS fonts is vast. Here are a few links: 1 2 3 Search on the web for more if you wish. Here is the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitri</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiesinmarketing.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vellandi.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the DTL comments. I was really impressed with Caspari because sometimes you need a font that is totally neural and doesn&#039;t cause any kind of psychological involvement. By the way, I&#039;m no expert in the field either, but I&#039;m currently mastering InDesign (well, there isn&#039;t much to master) and preparing another font-related slideshow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the DTL comments. I was really impressed with Caspari because sometimes you need a font that is totally neural and doesn&#8217;t cause any kind of psychological involvement. By the way, I&#8217;m no expert in the field either, but I&#8217;m currently mastering InDesign (well, there isn&#8217;t much to master) and preparing another font-related slideshow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Vellandi</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiesinmarketing.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Vellandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vellandi.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Dmitri,
For 99% of all office docs coming out of MS Office, I&#039;m not expecting a nice aesthetic appeal and neither are most people.  It&#039;s just nice to see some variation in standard office docs since most everyone will use either Times New Roman or Arial.  At least in the coming years, we&#039;ll see some of that.  For those people that take the time to experiment a little with other fonts out there, they&#039;ll be rewarded.  I recently changed the text in a resume from Garamond to Georgia, and found it so much more legible and modisch.

No doubt, the best type will always be rendered in compiled and fine-tuned in InDesign/Quark because of the increased control.

Regarding your review of DTL, great job!  I&#039;ll add my comments here:

&lt;strong&gt;Argo&lt;/strong&gt; - nice, yet kind of hard to compare to Adobe Ocean since the latter is a bit more condensed


&lt;strong&gt;Caspari&lt;/strong&gt; - Way cool.  No sense of humanism at all.  I perceive a little Greek flavor on the capital &quot;K&quot;.  The diameter of the bowl on the lowercase &quot;g&quot; looks a bit small.

&lt;strong&gt;Documenta&lt;/strong&gt; - The sagging upper lip on &quot;3&quot; is quite ugly.


&lt;strong&gt;Dorian&lt;/strong&gt; - lowercase &quot;y&quot; is stylish. Capital &quot;Y&quot; is strange indeed.  &quot;W&quot; seems somewhat distorted.


&lt;strong&gt;Fleischmann&lt;/strong&gt; - Seems like a mix of Modern (contrasted) and Old Style.  The big thorny serifs at times are a bit much when sitting next to the flatter serifs on other capital letters.


&lt;strong&gt;Nobel&lt;/strong&gt; - Those edges are indeed very sharp.  I like Futura a LOT better.


&lt;strong&gt;Prokyon&lt;/strong&gt; - Seems kind of Greek.  That lowercase &quot;g&quot; gets annoying to read.  This type would probably look good on a bag of frozen Falafel.


&lt;strong&gt;Romulus&lt;/strong&gt; - Elegant.  I like Hoefler Text, although that is quite an expensive font family.


&lt;strong&gt;Unico&lt;/strong&gt; - Numerals are stylish


&lt;strong&gt;Albertina&lt;/strong&gt; - When I enlarge the PDF, some lowercase letters overpower their neighbor in size.  Look at the &quot;x&quot; in &quot;example&quot; between the &quot;e&quot; and &quot;a&quot;.


&lt;strong&gt;Caspari&lt;/strong&gt; - Definitely superior for being a bit more compact.  Exhibits some of the properties of Gill.

Thanks for stopping by again and sharing your input.  It means a lot to have some intelligent conversation for my readers and I.  I&#039;m a typophile but by no means well-versed in the field (still learning).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dmitri,<br />
For 99% of all office docs coming out of MS Office, I&#8217;m not expecting a nice aesthetic appeal and neither are most people.  It&#8217;s just nice to see some variation in standard office docs since most everyone will use either Times New Roman or Arial.  At least in the coming years, we&#8217;ll see some of that.  For those people that take the time to experiment a little with other fonts out there, they&#8217;ll be rewarded.  I recently changed the text in a resume from Garamond to Georgia, and found it so much more legible and modisch.</p>
<p>No doubt, the best type will always be rendered in compiled and fine-tuned in InDesign/Quark because of the increased control.</p>
<p>Regarding your review of DTL, great job!  I&#8217;ll add my comments here:</p>
<p><strong>Argo</strong> &#8211; nice, yet kind of hard to compare to Adobe Ocean since the latter is a bit more condensed</p>
<p><strong>Caspari</strong> &#8211; Way cool.  No sense of humanism at all.  I perceive a little Greek flavor on the capital &#8220;K&#8221;.  The diameter of the bowl on the lowercase &#8220;g&#8221; looks a bit small.</p>
<p><strong>Documenta</strong> &#8211; The sagging upper lip on &#8220;3&#8243; is quite ugly.</p>
<p><strong>Dorian</strong> &#8211; lowercase &#8220;y&#8221; is stylish. Capital &#8220;Y&#8221; is strange indeed.  &#8220;W&#8221; seems somewhat distorted.</p>
<p><strong>Fleischmann</strong> &#8211; Seems like a mix of Modern (contrasted) and Old Style.  The big thorny serifs at times are a bit much when sitting next to the flatter serifs on other capital letters.</p>
<p><strong>Nobel</strong> &#8211; Those edges are indeed very sharp.  I like Futura a LOT better.</p>
<p><strong>Prokyon</strong> &#8211; Seems kind of Greek.  That lowercase &#8220;g&#8221; gets annoying to read.  This type would probably look good on a bag of frozen Falafel.</p>
<p><strong>Romulus</strong> &#8211; Elegant.  I like Hoefler Text, although that is quite an expensive font family.</p>
<p><strong>Unico</strong> &#8211; Numerals are stylish</p>
<p><strong>Albertina</strong> &#8211; When I enlarge the PDF, some lowercase letters overpower their neighbor in size.  Look at the &#8220;x&#8221; in &#8220;example&#8221; between the &#8220;e&#8221; and &#8220;a&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Caspari</strong> &#8211; Definitely superior for being a bit more compact.  Exhibits some of the properties of Gill.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by again and sharing your input.  It means a lot to have some intelligent conversation for my readers and I.  I&#8217;m a typophile but by no means well-versed in the field (still learning).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitri</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiesinmarketing.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vellandi.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Well, the problem with Office is lack of support for many OpenType features, which means buying a Pro font for Office is a bad idea anyway. Thus, publishing will be a two-stage process for a few more years, with document preparation in Word (or in Notepad) and then typesetting in InDesign or similar.

Adobe&#039;s fonts are great workhoses. Recently I did a small review of the Dutch Type Library, but even it seems to be unable to match Adobe for quality. Well, that&#039;s my opinion, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the problem with Office is lack of support for many OpenType features, which means buying a Pro font for Office is a bad idea anyway. Thus, publishing will be a two-stage process for a few more years, with document preparation in Word (or in Notepad) and then typesetting in InDesign or similar.</p>
<p>Adobe&#8217;s fonts are great workhoses. Recently I did a small review of the Dutch Type Library, but even it seems to be unable to match Adobe for quality. Well, that&#8217;s my opinion, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Vellandi</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiesinmarketing.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Vellandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vellandi.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Dmitri, Thanks for stopping by!

I agree that these fonts are nothing spectacular in comparison to many of the great premium fonts out there, classic and new.  Some of my favorites in the major styles -

&lt;strong&gt;Sans-serifs:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/488/gillsans-family.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gill Sans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/472/futura-family.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Futura&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/1266/neuehelvetica-family.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Neue Helvetica&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/49252/rotissansserif-family.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rotis Sans&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Serifs:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/1317/palatino-family.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Palatino&lt;/a&gt;, any flavor of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/20/adobegaramond-family.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Garamond &lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/616/itcclearface-family.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clearface&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/1594/walbaum-family.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Walbaum&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Slab-Serifs:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/261/clarendonlt-family.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clarendon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emigre.com/fontpage.php?PChoSlR.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cholla Slab&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/corporate-e/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Corporate E&lt;/a&gt;

However, since most of these fonts can only be purchased...or some may come with a new system (like Futura or Garamond); it&#039;s probably nice to promote some of the free ones out there for people writing documents in MS Office.  That environment is where I see these fonts being used the most.

I really like Calibri - it has replaced Arial as the standard/initial font in Word 07.  I&#039;ll likely hardly ever use these fonts for any graphics though as I have my own set of favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dmitri, Thanks for stopping by!</p>
<p>I agree that these fonts are nothing spectacular in comparison to many of the great premium fonts out there, classic and new.  Some of my favorites in the major styles -</p>
<p><strong>Sans-serifs:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.linotype.com/488/gillsans-family.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.linotype.com/488/gillsans-family.html?referer=');">Gill Sans</a>, <a href="http://www.linotype.com/472/futura-family.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.linotype.com/472/futura-family.html?referer=');">Futura</a>, <a href="http://www.linotype.com/1266/neuehelvetica-family.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.linotype.com/1266/neuehelvetica-family.html?referer=');">Neue Helvetica</a>, and <a href="http://www.linotype.com/49252/rotissansserif-family.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.linotype.com/49252/rotissansserif-family.html?referer=');">Rotis Sans</a></p>
<p><strong>Serifs:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.linotype.com/1317/palatino-family.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.linotype.com/1317/palatino-family.html?referer=');">Palatino</a>, any flavor of <a href="http://www.linotype.com/20/adobegaramond-family.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.linotype.com/20/adobegaramond-family.html?referer=');">Garamond </a>, <a href="http://www.linotype.com/616/itcclearface-family.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.linotype.com/616/itcclearface-family.html?referer=');">Clearface</a>, and <a href="http://www.linotype.com/1594/walbaum-family.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.linotype.com/1594/walbaum-family.html?referer=');">Walbaum</a></p>
<p><strong>Slab-Serifs:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.linotype.com/261/clarendonlt-family.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.linotype.com/261/clarendonlt-family.html?referer=');">Clarendon</a>, <a href="http://www.emigre.com/fontpage.php?PChoSlR.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.emigre.com/fontpage.php?PChoSlR.html&amp;referer=');">Cholla Slab</a>, and <a href="http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/corporate-e/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/corporate-e/?referer=');">Corporate E</a></p>
<p>However, since most of these fonts can only be purchased&#8230;or some may come with a new system (like Futura or Garamond); it&#8217;s probably nice to promote some of the free ones out there for people writing documents in MS Office.  That environment is where I see these fonts being used the most.</p>
<p>I really like Calibri &#8211; it has replaced Arial as the standard/initial font in Word 07.  I&#8217;ll likely hardly ever use these fonts for any graphics though as I have my own set of favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitri</title>
		<link>http://www.melodiesinmarketing.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vellandi.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/6-free-great-fonts/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I tried all of these in print. They are nothing special. Consolas is moderately useful as a default monospaced font (for those not using Bitstream Vera Sans). Still, these fonts are no match for, say, the Adobe Font Folio fonts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried all of these in print. They are nothing special. Consolas is moderately useful as a default monospaced font (for those not using Bitstream Vera Sans). Still, these fonts are no match for, say, the Adobe Font Folio fonts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

