Melodies in Marketing

Authentic Green Marketing & Sustainable Product Development

Green Consumer Insights from the Blogosphere June 30, 2008

Filed under: Marketing, Sustainability, Video — Mario Vellandi @ 5:08 pm

[Video Link for Email/Other Subscribers]

Date: June 4, 2008
Location: Sustainable Brands 08 - Monterey, California
Organizer: Sustainable Life Media, Business & Industry News for Sustainability

Speakers: Janet Eden-Harris, CEO, Umbria
Averill Doering, Manager of Consumer Insights & Strategy, Umbria

Summary: Umbria is a marketing intelligence company that analyzes social media —including blogs, message boards, Usenet, and product review sites. They deliver not just data, but insights into brands, markets, consumers and trends.

In this presentation, Janet and Averill discuss some basic findings from a recently completed, much larger study based on analysis from millions of blogosphere conversations. Topics included:

1 ) Who Umbria is and their research methodology. According to a five-spoke diagram around a Topic, they identify:

  • Who (Age, Gender)
  • What (Sentiment, Subtopics, Unmet Needs)
  • How Much (Posting Volume, Speaker Volume)
  • When (Posting Date)
  • Why (Values, Purchase & Usage, Media)

2 ) The level of discussion online, popularity of topics, relation to brands, and how these numbers have shifted between 2007-2008. The current top five most talked about industries are: Energy & Fuel, Automotive, Food & Beverage, Transportation & Travel, and Packaging.

3 ) Who’s talking?

  • 45% Gen-Y (33% Female, 12% Male)
  • 26% Gen-X (17% Female, 9% Male)
  • 29% Boomer (13% Female, 16% Male)

4 ) Umbria identified 9 consumer profiles around sustainability; placed them on a grid with the x-axis measuring disagreement to agreement, and y-axis measuring inaction to action; and their percentage changes between 2007-2008. They include: Apathetic, Negator, Skeptic, Rejector, Uncertain, Idler, Shifter, Guilty, and Activist.

umbria consumer profile personas nine grid

Between 2007-2008, the percentage of Negators and Uncertains decreased, while Shifters, Idlers, and Guilties increased. Profiles are further explained in the slide presentation (see Additional Learning).

5 ) The challenges facing consumers in regards to awareness, understanding the ‘truth’ and source credibility, are large. Inputs include: Journalists, Enthusiasts, Friends & Family, Experts, Government, NGO’s, Academics, Artists, and Businesses. Staying aware is important, but folks have a limited temporary interest capacity before they’re willing to listen again. Green & Eco-fatigue is very real - too much info can lead to apathy, cynicism, uncertainty, and guilt.

6 ) Next on the path come feelings of accountability (am I responsible? can I make a difference?), and personal relevance (is this meta/sub-topic even important or relevant to me, my lifestyle, and interests?).

7 ) Regarding Action, individuals will consider:

  • Lifestyle Impact & Habit
  • Availability
  • Cost (Financial, Time, Other)
  • Quality (comparing alternatives)
  • Functionality
  • Usage Experience

8 ) How consumers are perceiving benefits today? Largely, they tend to be:

  • Intangible (relatedness hard to grasp)
  • Difficult to Measure (subjective; no easy green metrics available on ‘green’ we are now, versus where we could be)
  • Uncertain (How do my actions impact the community, the greater cause at hand, and the future (immediate, long-term)

9 ) What benefits do they desire though? They are:

  • Seamlessness
  • Productivity
  • Social Connection
  • Inspiration

10 ) What are people’s desired emotions?

  • Accomplishment (Personal)
  • Pride & Acceptance (Social)
  • Stress & Anxiety Reduction
  • Excitement

11 ) A Three-Step Framework for making brands resonate and inspire action:

  • Realism: Make it Simple
  • Relevance: Make it Personal
  • Social: Make it Visible

12 ) At large, successful organizations will need to answer the following questions:

  • Why - this need, benefit, desire
  • What - offering will fulfill these
  • How - should this be delivered

Additional Learning:

 

Diane MacEachern - Big Green Purse June 16, 2008

Filed under: Marketing, Sustainability, Video — Mario Vellandi @ 5:35 pm

Date: June 3, 2008
Location: Sustainable Brands 08 - Monterey, California
Organizer: Sustainable Life Media, Business & Industry News for Sustainability
Introducer: Anya Kamenetz - Staff Writer, Fast Company

Speakers: Diane MacEachern - Founder & Author, BigGreenPurse.com

Summary:
In this presentation, Diane discusses the power of women in purchasing decisions (80% of all consumer goods); challenges women face in transitioning to a green lifestyle given time/budget constraints and ongoing confusion on what’s healthy and safe; and how they can at various levels of society affect the positive future we seek to attain. Additionally, this presentation discusses common mistakes marketers make in “selling” sustainability to women and how to employ straightforward messaging and marketing strategies to increase acceptance of green goods.

Additional Resources:

 

The North Pacific Gyre and Garbage Island June 15, 2008

Filed under: Sustainability, Video — Mario Vellandi @ 6:01 pm

Vice magazine is putting out some fantastic video journalism covering culture, lifestyle, politics, the environment, and other topics. I really look up to them for great inspiration. If you’ve met me, you’ll know that I believe video is really the new frontier for effective communication and story coverage. Print and the written word work well for many topics, but for some: “seeing is really believing”.

This 12 part series they produced is on the massive underwater trash mass, north of Hawaii. Each video is very concise and runs about 5 min. Here’s the series introduction:

.

[Link to Complete Series]

 

John Edson - Product Design Strategist June 14, 2008

Filed under: Design, New Product Development, Sustainability, Video — Mario Vellandi @ 9:12 pm

[Video Link for Email/Other Subscribers]

A few weeks ago I met with John Edson, President of Lunar Design. Since we were both interested in developing products that are sustainable, desirable, and profitable…I decided to interview him for a brief 5min conversation. Enjoy!

John’s podcast can be found at:
http://www.icon-o-cast.com

 

Yoplait Packaging Redesign - About Time June 12, 2008

Filed under: Design, Sustainability — Mario Vellandi @ 2:39 pm

Changes in packaging design can be done for a variety of reasons, including:

  • Branding
  • Usability
  • Sustainability

A single design change can affect all three areas. While cost reduction is also an important incentive, if any of these three areas is somehow compromised, the redesign has failed.

So, I noticed after opening a box of Yoplait yogurt I purchased at Costco that the container design had changed after so many years (some online research indicated about twenty). For those of you unfamiliar with the old design, you can do a Google image search.

Here’s how the redesign looks:

general mills yoplait container curved redesign

Branding
Very little has changed except our visual perception of the shape and lid (peel off). But positively perceived improvements in the next two areas can affect the appeal/desirability of the brand.

Usability
Big improvement. With a curved shape, you can see the spoon can more easily pickup the yogurt. Also, the lip now faces outward. Over many years (and I’m sure all of us can relate), I’ve twisted the cup with my spoon under the inward-facing lip, trying to get that last little bit of yummy strawberry (or your flavor of choice). Finally, a peel off lid (not shown) quickens the opening process, in comparison to the foil lid there was before.

Sustainability
Perhaps General Mills (parent company) was able to reduce the amount of Polystyrene plastic for this 6oz. cup, but I’m not sure. However, the graphics are now printed on a paper label which completely wraps around the cup. If someone believes printing on the plastic like before would be preferable, please leave a comment. This does add a new aspect to the supply chain which should be accounted for in the lifecycle scenario analysis.

One very huge sustainable advantage with this redesign involves its disposal and effect on nature. Plastic aside, I found from some older articles online that the previous cup’s lip combined with the wider base, and narrower top, had contributed to many wild animals getting their heads trapped inside. If you Google “Yoplait skunk”, you’ll see what I mean. In any case, the inward facing lip acting on the natural design of fur and its direction on the body created a locking mechanism seriously inhibiting animals from simply shaking their heads or trying to pull it off (We can’t expect critters to be that smart can we?). What disturbed me a little was in reading this article, it pointed to studies by the Humane Society and complaints against General Mills coupled with calls for redesign action…back around 1998 (Yikes!).

Summary
All in all, I think it’s a great example of how a redesign can improve a product’s performance across these three areas. My only additional recommendation is that General Mills add some copy on the label: “Please Recycle”.

 

Quick Note for You June 11, 2008

Filed under: Intermezzo — Mario Vellandi @ 2:44 pm

special note for my readers and a new address